# 06 — Longhorn: real, replicated storage The app-of-apps you applied in [`docs/04-app-of-apps.md`](04-app-of-apps.md) already brought up `longhorn` alongside `demo` and `metallb`. This doc explains what it does and how to actually use it — there's no address to pick this time, unlike MetalLB; the interesting decisions already happened back in [`docs/02-talos-bootstrap.md`](02-talos-bootstrap.md). ## Why this is needed at all A Kubernetes Pod's own filesystem disappears the moment that Pod does — fine for a stateless web server, useless for anything that needs to keep data around (a database, uploaded files, anything you'd be upset to lose). Kubernetes' answer is a **PersistentVolumeClaim (PVC)**: an app asks for some amount of storage, and something has to actually provide it. On a cloud provider, that something is the cloud's own disk service. On bare metal — your three Talos nodes — nothing provides that on its own, the same gap MetalLB fills for IP addresses rather than storage. **Longhorn** is that provider: it turns a plain disk on each node into one pool of storage, and replicates each volume across more than one node. Lose a node, and the data backing any volume that had a replica elsewhere is still there. This is why Longhorn needs more than one storage-providing node at all: with only one, "replicated storage" has nothing to replicate *to*. This cluster deliberately keeps storage off the three Raspberry Pi control planes — they have no data disk and are not meant to run application workloads (see [`docs/02-talos-bootstrap.md`](02-talos-bootstrap.md)). Longhorn instead runs only on the two dedicated Proxmox workers, each with its own local NVMe-backed disk on a separate physical host (Gimli and Titus). `defaultReplicaCount: 2` in [`apps/longhorn/values.yaml`](../apps/longhorn/values.yaml) matches that: with exactly two storage nodes, two replicas is the most redundancy possible — losing either worker still leaves one complete copy. ## What's already running **`apps/longhorn.yaml`** → one Application, pointing at `apps/longhorn`, a Helm chart that pulls in the official upstream Longhorn chart (see [`apps/longhorn/Chart.yaml`](../apps/longhorn/Chart.yaml)) — the same umbrella-chart pattern as MetalLB, just without any extra templates of its own this time. The interesting configuration already happened at the Talos layer, back in [`talos/patch-longhorn.yaml`](../talos/patch-longhorn.yaml): each worker found, formatted, and mounted its own ≥300GiB disk at `/var/mnt/longhorn`. [`apps/longhorn/values.yaml`](../apps/longhorn/values.yaml) points Longhorn's `defaultDataPath` at that exact path — this is the thing that makes Longhorn use *that* disk instead of carving space out of each node's root filesystem (small, and on Talos, not meant for this kind of data anyway). [`talos/patch-worker.yaml`](../talos/patch-worker.yaml) also labels each worker `node.longhorn.io/create-default-disk=true`, which is what actually limits default-disk creation to these two nodes instead of every node in the cluster — without it, Longhorn would try (and fail) to create a default disk on the Raspberry Pi control planes too. ## Verify it's actually working ```sh kubectl -n longhorn-system get pods -o wide ``` Expect a `longhorn-manager` and `longhorn-csi-plugin` Pod on each of the two workers (not the control planes), plus one `instance-manager` per worker once a volume exists, all `Running`. Confirm Longhorn agrees which nodes are eligible storage nodes: ```sh kubectl -n longhorn-system get nodes.longhorn.io -o wide ``` Only the two workers should show `READY=true`, `ALLOWSCHEDULING=true`, `SCHEDULABLE=true`. ```sh kubectl get storageclass ``` Longhorn's chart creates a default `StorageClass` called `longhorn` automatically — this is what makes it the thing Kubernetes reaches for whenever an app asks for storage without naming one specifically. ## Try it: give the demo app real storage The demo app's HTML currently lives in a ConfigMap (see [`docs/07-your-first-change.md`](07-your-first-change.md)) — fine for a few lines of text, but not how a real app would store real data. As a hands-on check that Longhorn actually works, ask Claude to help you: 1. Add a small `PersistentVolumeClaim` to `apps/demo/`, requesting a couple of gigabytes with no `storageClassName` set (so it uses Longhorn's default). 2. Mount it into the demo Deployment somewhere harmless, like `/usr/share/nginx/html/data`. 3. Push it, let Argo CD sync, and confirm: ```sh kubectl -n demo get pvc ``` should show your claim `Bound`, and ```sh kubectl -n longhorn-system get volumes ``` should show a matching volume, `healthy`, with more than one replica. This isn't part of the checklist below — treat it as an optional exercise once the pre-installed pieces are confirmed working, not a requirement to move on. > **Ask Claude:** "what would happen to that PVC's data if I lost one of > my two storage workers right now?" — worth being able to answer before you > trust this with anything real. ## Checklist - [ ] `kubectl -n longhorn-system get pods -o wide` shows manager/CSI Pods `Running` on both workers, and none on the control planes - [ ] `kubectl -n longhorn-system get nodes.longhorn.io` shows exactly the two workers as schedulable storage nodes - [ ] `kubectl get storageclass` shows a default `longhorn` StorageClass - [ ] (Optional) Gave the demo app a real PVC and confirmed it's `Bound` with a healthy, replicated Longhorn volume behind it Continue to [`docs/07-your-first-change.md`](07-your-first-change.md).